I was invited Friday afternoon to join a Facebook group called "Fire Bob Bradley". The group has attracted more than 800 members -- people who care enough about the U.S. national team's performance to register their frustration (a good thing) and who also, somehow, believe that removing any single individual will quickly bridge the massive talent, cultural and logistical gap so evident in this week's disappointing Confederations Cup losses to Italy and Brazil.Bradley has made his mistakes. Starting the obviously struggling DaMarcus Beasley against the Brazilians was a stunner. But to assume that replacing the coach (with whom?) will boost U.S. Soccer's effort to solve deep-seeded problems before what looks like an inevitable three-and-out performance at next summer's World Cup is naive and counterproductive.
Disappointment usually is tied to expectations. After five straight World Cup appearances, four CONCACAF Gold Cup titles and 13 years of a professional league, many American fans are ready to take the next step. The problem is that they think they're entitled to skip several on the way because they've tasted a bit of success. It doesn't work like that.
During the telecast of the 3-0 thumping by Brazil, ESPN showed a couple of highlights from the Americans' only victory over the Selecao, the 1-0 Gold Cup upset in 1998. Here was coach Steve Sampson's starting 11 for that match:
GK Kasey Keller; Ds Mike Burns, Alexi Lalas, Eddie Pope, Jeff Agoos; MFs Frankie Hejduk, John Harkes, Joe-Max Moore, Cobi Jones; Fs Eric Wynalda, Roy Wegerle.
The beloved Sampson brought Brian McBride on for Wynalda and replaced Wegerle with Preki, who scored after that famous cutback to his left foot.
That game was 11 years ago. How many of the players at Bradley's disposal this week would you rather have on the field? Certainly Landon Donovan over Wegerle. Perhaps Clint Dempsey instead of Moore or a healthy Steve Cherundolo or Carlos Bocanegra over Burns. There definitely are athletes on the current national team whose technical skill is superior - Jozy Altidore, Benny Feilhaber and Jose Francisco Torres come to mind. But would you rely on those players in the clutch, against the best teams in the world?
What also is painfully clear is that this current generation of American players lacks the intangibles to handle opponents like Brazil or Italy. I have little doubt that had a Brazilian or Italian lunged into the same tackles that resulted in this week's red cards for Ricardo Clark and Sacha Kljestan that the "Jordan Rules" of international soccer would have meant mere cautions from the genuflecting referees. But this isn't news, and it's something American players haven't seemed to grasp. And it has nothing to do with Bradley. The 2008 Olympic team eliminated themselves from the Beijing games thanks largely to stupid cards for Freddy Adu, Michael Bradley and Michael Orozco. That group was coached by celebrated disciplinarian Peter Nowak.
In addition, the technical ability of Dempsey, Feilhaber and Beasley hasn't helped them to avoid making horrendous recent misplays that led directly to goals for the opposition (Dempsey in the World Cup qualifier against Honduras, Feilhaber against Italy and Beasley vs. Brazil). These are issues of concentration and field awareness that are at the core of an athlete's personality and development. They do not come from an individual coach, especially one that handles them once they're professionals and deals with them only during abbreviated national team camps and tournaments.
Bradley can bench them, but who does he bring on? It would be nice if Brian Ching was healthy, but he's just one player. Overall, the lack of experienced depth in the American player pool is troubling. In fact, fans on the aforementioned Facebook forum are calling for Adu -- the same player who's been ridiculed for his inability to get a game in Europe. The U.S. has far too many athletes in similar situations, either playing for smaller clubs in leagues no stronger than MLS or riding the bench in more prestigious circuits. For every Bocanegra, who's effective for both a club in a major European league and the national team, there are a half-dozen players either flailing abroad or trying to better themselves in MLS. Sometimes success in the domestic league works (McBride, Hejduk, etc.). Sometimes, like in the case of players like Taylor Twellman and Jason Kreis, it doesn't.
We simply are not developing footballers who can compete at the highest level. That starts with youth clubs, the college system, the Olympic Development Program. It's not Bradley's job. What is happening in South Africa is the revelation of the former, not the indictment of the latter.
So the fans joining that Facebook group must think some other coach will be capable of making these current players better, of magically transforming someone who can't get off the bench for a Spanish second division team or who's slogging through the Danish league into someone who can score against Brazil. Why this generation of players has failed to match the vigor and composure of their predecessors is a question for another post -- are they too eager to skip steps as well? -- but to assume that Bradley can do anything about the core issues resulting in this week's routs is foolish.
The problem goes to development. To the way our players are forged as teenagers. No coach, not even sought-after Juergen Klinsmann (who didn't even last a full season at Bayern Munich), could have changed that in South Africa.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-19-2009 @ 7:22PM
charles clough said...
Bradley is a poor coacn and a terrible motivator. He plays favorites and overlooks the young American superb players like Kenny Cooper and Freddie Adu and especially Cooper's proven (Golden Boot) scoring ability that could add much needed offensive to a stagnant, poorly motivated stagnent team
Reply
6-19-2009 @ 8:37PM
Catamount said...
Most fans i've been reading on the boards agree that the problem is not just the coach. They are also asking for Gulati's job and looking for a person to lead the organizations at USSF and USYSA that will make systematic changes. The parent-coach approach has done all it can. Soccer teams in high school and club don't even play during the same season nation wide. There is a lot to be done and most fans know it. Getting 85% of the way there was easy, now comes the hard part, that last 15%. Most fans I read believe an overhaul is needed, starting with the head of USSF and the coach of the National Team, who will set the parameters for what a top US player needs to be like.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:27AM
Ryan said...
check out a great new blog about the USMNT:
http://ryannoel.wordpress.com
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 1:57AM
Greg said...
Those of us who joined the Facebook group are not necessarily stating that "removing any single individual will ***quickly*** bridge the massive talent, cultural and logistical gap so evident in this week's disappointing Confederations Cup losses." Most of us realize we need more patience (we are accustomed to that...remember "Project 2010," from which we're still waiting to see the fruits?). Nor are we saying that firing Bradley would be sufficient for all that ails the USMNT. It is simply (and, yes, arguably) a necessary part of a larger effort that perhaps one day will altogether be sufficient to bring about progress.
As to a couple other particulars in your article (which I enjoyed, by the way), there are a handful of folks on the Facebook site calling for Adu, yes. But that does not necessarily reflect all 1000+ in the group. Remember it is a diverse bunch on Facebook. The overall point of the group is to pressure the USSF regarding Bradley. The Adu chat is merely random member-added opinion. I, for one, wished to see him and/or Torres as substitutes at some point when the Brazil match was out of hand simply for the sake of experience. That does not mean I think his benchings have led to our losses.
And you rightly bring up player mistakes. However, loads of people on the US Soccer Facebook page were screaming through their computers and in their posts when the starting 11 versus Brazil was announced. Seeing Beasley's name there should not have surprised us, but it did. Bradley did it again. And, as many predicted (but Bradley apparently did not), Beasley performed miserably, even coughing up the ball that led to goal #2. It was predictable, and Bradley should not have turned a blind eye.
Other points I won't go into: horrendous substitution patterns in both matches so far (e.g., waiting too long to use them versus Italy when we were a man down and gassed, and leaving one unused versus Brazil); not attacking Brazil's relatively weak back left, which many teams (including Canada!) have tried to exploit until the very end of the match; a lack of offensive strategy beyond set pieces and hoping for Altidore to draw PKs in the box; and what I personally see as a lack of personality for the team -- what is our style of play? where is the heart? Some of each of these things falls on Bradley's shoulders.
I could go on for hours about Gulati, Bradley, the performances this week, the development levels, the player ranks, etc., but Bradley's firing/resignation absolutely must be first and foremost in the discussion, in my opinion. Not the be-all-end-all solution, as your article suggests many of us think, but definitely a significant focus and wish for many of us...on Facebook or elsewhere.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 11:07AM
suaverico1117 said...
you are absolutely correct Mr. Straus, our soccer players nowadays lack the simple basis skills that most of the world footballers have achieved....but that is only achieved playing "street ball" 24/7/365 and not twice a week structure practices for our youth players these days. Myself as a youth coach can hardly get all of my 18 roster players to a practice, usually 14-15 players, everyone always have an excuse for missing a practice...and do you actually believe these kids are practicing soccer in the neighborhood with their friends? not at all, most likely they are shooting a basketball or playing computer games...by the way computer games has made our kids (all in general) lazier than ever, something in the early 90's we didn't have. As for coach Bradley, unfortunately he is in a tough situation with having his son playing on the team, Michael should be there, but unfortunately other players feel favoritism and definetely jealousy towards Michael, this changes the way a coach coaches a team. Also, mistakes he's been making (starting Beasley) are avoidable, Beasley should not be on the team, he is horrible, always was....the team lacks aggressiveness in the midfield (working as a team, tackling effectively and timely), they also lack vision, besides Bradley and Donovan, they don't move well off the ball, they don't work hard to get the ball back, etc etc... their forwards lack vision, 1 v1 skills and awareness where they should be to receive a ball...they are absolutely lazy, bring Mc Bride, he is still our best US forward right now. Defensively the kids in the middle are awful, can't defend in the air like Balboa and Lalas did in the past...and that's a big problem we have nowadays, teams are scoring on us in the air and we have players 6' 3" and taller that can't time a jump? probably coach Bradley shouldn't be there, but who else can we bring, forget about a foreign coach with international experience....the good ones don't speak english and it's too late to learn english in a few months...lets support our team and hopefully we can turn things around...by the way Freddy Adu is not as good as everyone thinks he is...when he played my youth teams a few years back, one of my less skills players took him out of the game...we won 1-0 and all he did was hug the ball and complain to the referee all game long.
Maybe in the future, parents, coaches and the US federation can push kids to play "street soccer" with 3v3, 4v4 or any small sided unsupervised games all over the country...WE NEED STREET SOCCER AND WE NEED KIDS TO PLAY IN THEIR BACKYARD LOVING THE GAME LIKE THE BRAZILIANS, ARGENTINIANS, DUTCH, ITALIANS, ENGLISH, SPANISH ... otherwise we will always be pointing fingers and blaming each other for our incompetence in international soccer. VIVA USA!!!!!
Reply
6-22-2009 @ 2:53PM
cevalenti said...
I disagree that the US does not have enough kids playing "street soccer". My son lived and breathed soccer to the exclusion of all other sports and the computer and he was not the only one. You're never going to have 100% of the players on a youth team with the same dedication but you should sure expect it from the MNT. A large problem is how kids move up the ranks. Someone else here mentioned how expensive it is for parents with kids in premier league and the same is true of ODP. We need a better way to identify youth players and find a way to make it more affordable. It is also my experience that the coach has a tremendous impact on team spirit and unfortunately, Coach Bradley does not seem to be able to inspire them to play with their hearts.
6-20-2009 @ 11:26AM
thomcob said...
Apart from the merits of the debate over the degree to which Bradley is responsible for the US's horrid performance, the terrific original post and the responses demonstrate the potential of sites like this. All should be congratulated on the entries, which are the stuff that makes readers want to return again and again. Congratulations.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 12:02PM
sqaganyana said...
Certainly the problems go deeper than Bob Bradley, but he does need to be replaced. The dull and toothless tactics, the lack of motivation, the horrific line-up decisions, the favoritism are all reasons why Bob Bradley should resign or be let go. I am not turning a blind eye to our talent and development issues, but I am not of a mind that "until we can fix all of our problems we should fix none of them."
A good coach will not likely make the players better, but he does make a team better. He also helps players to reach their potential. This team is stagnating. I am pretty sure that our current crop of US players is more talented than previous editions and can play with that same passion and mental toughness.
Reply
6-20-2009 @ 5:50PM
zipotedude said...
Ive noticed that ever since coach Peter Nowak left the team for Philadelphia, the team has performed poorly. He brought great insight to the team; and Bradley listened to him. And the team looked better. Now That coach Bradly calls all the shots, the team is going thru its worst moments.Everybosy has already commented about Bradley tactics and player selection.Mr.Straus doesnt think Bradley is at fault;maybe he doesnt see that the coach has reached his limit and needs to be replace with a more experienced coach who doesnt buckle under pressure and needs to inject the right stuff into the team.Mr.Strauss questions "replace hime with whom?" is Sven Goran Erickson available? He would fit better into the USMNT than Mexicos for obvious reasons. Is this what Bradley has shown so far what could happen in SA in 2010?
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 4:46PM
pzaluk said...
Very good posts. It all comes down to touches on the ball and technical skill; U.S. soccer has advanced as far as it can go on athleticism--now the structure has to change to allow players to hone their skills 24/7/365....only then will we see a difference. Coaching change may help but that is not the long term solution....
Reply
6-21-2009 @ 6:34PM
Ryan said...
New article up at: http://ryannoel.wordpress.com
Reply
6-29-2009 @ 8:58PM
John Torocsik said...
We can rejoice in many aspects of the US play against the brasilians. They, however made one fatal mistake that cost them the championship: "They fixed something that was not broken" - namely: istead of providing a valid offensive stature, they grouped-up on their own sixteen yard area, leaving the opposition's wingmen and midcourt players alone to do whatever they decided to do.
Reply