EURO 2008 has been a wildly successful tournament on many levels. The quality of play has been very high, the games have been memorable, and the organization, by all accounts, has been top notch. So naturally, UEFA decided to go out and fix what isn't broken.According to The Guardian, UEFA has received "universal support" for expanding the European Championships from 16 to 24 teams, starting in 2016. The Scottish Football Association put the measure forward, and by all accounts, nobody has spoken against the idea, which means it will likely be approved soon.
Personally, I think this ruins a good thing. The current 16-team format is perfect for an international summer tournament like this. Adding two more groups complicates scheduling, especially in the knockout stage. How many teams get through? 12? 16? Expanding the tournament might bring more talent to the table, but it takes away some of the challenge of qualifying. Why make it easier for teams to get through? Isn't having too many teams make the playoffs the biggest complaint fans have with American sports?
Of course, I'm sure most Scottish soccer fans would disagree with me on this. Scotland hasn't gotten through the qualifying rounds since 1996. No wonder they proposed this idea. I bet England's even more enthusiastic about it than they are.














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-28-2008 @ 3:27PM
modestd said...
I as well like the current format, but if this does happen it will allow half of Europe to contend in the final part of the tournament. I think this will be to the detriment of the competition. I don't want to watch the Netherlands beat up on Malta in the group stage. Scotland (and England) need to get their act together to qualify. I do not however agree on letting who ever is hosting automatic qualification. That takes away one spot (or two in this years case) from a country that is better. Just my two cents.
Reply
6-29-2008 @ 1:40PM
Dr Huxtable said...
This idea sucks. If you can't qualify under the current conditions then you don't deserve to be there.
Reply